Last Post or First Post?

[SoftWareRevue]

In the forum index, there's a column that's titled Last Post.

If you click on the name of the thread, it takes you to (surprise!) the last post of the thread.

If you click on the arrow icon, it takes you to (surpise again!) the last post of the thread.

I would like the thread title to go to the beginning of the thread. Isn't that where threads usually link to?

I usually know if I've been in a thread. And going to the last post of a thread I know I haven't been in, is just annoying . . . to me. :breakhear

What's everyone else thinky? :think:

[Mikey]

I think the name of the thread should go to the thread, and not the last post. The button on the other hand should go straight to the last post.

[Tyler]

I like it going to the last post. I have a habit of clickin' the link; not the button. :angel:

[writespeak]

I would like the thread title to go to the beginning of the thread.

I agree.

And going to the last post of a thread I know I haven't been in, is just annoying . . . to me. :breakhear

I agree. We can't have :breakhear around here. :hrmph:

What's everyone else thinky? :think:

Hmmm...I thinky the same as SWRy. About this, that is. ;)

Lois

[Aussie Bob]

I think the name of the thread should go to the thread, and not the last post. The button on the other hand should go straight to the last post.
Ditto. That way the universe will not implode. :dfingers:

[Mikey]

so ya wanna do it?

[Jan]

But if it is a thread you have been in and it's a loooooooooong thread, why go all the way back to the beginning, only to click again to get to last page?

[writespeak]

People who haven't read the thread yet may want to read it from the beginning, so we should give them a link that takes them to the beginning. :)

Why have 2 links that go to the same place when doing so takes away a link that some people would use? We already have the arrow icon that goes to the end of the thread. :fish:

Lois

[Jan]

Six of one and half a dozen of the other IMO.

[SoftWareRevue]

so ya wanna do it?Yes please. :flirt:

[SoftWareRevue]

People who haven't read the thread yet may want to read it from the beginning, so we should give them a link that takes them to the beginning. . .People who haven't read it yet, should read from the beginning. :dfingers:

[Mikey]

my idea works perfectly. One link for the last post, one for the beginning.

[SoftWareRevue]

Works nicely Mikey! :bow:

[Aussie Bob]

People who haven't read it yet, should read from the beginning. :dfingers:
Yes, by clicking on the name of the thread. :fish:

[Aussie Bob]

my idea works perfectly. One link for the last post, one for the beginning.
Yes, that's the natural order of the universe. :banana2:

[Mikey]

Okay, i'm gonna go do this now. If you hate it, let me know.

[Mikey]

There.

[Aussie Bob]

Thank you Mikey. The universe is much safer now. :whew:

[Professor Obvious]

Six of one and half a dozen of the other IMO.That equals 12.

Where's the 12 thread?

[SoftWareRevue]

. . .

Where's the 12 thread?Isn't that obvious?








:rofl: